Standing Up For The Rights Of People With Intellectual Disabilities-----
Further report on the VOR Washington Initiative this year
Standing Up For The Rights Of People With Intellectual Disabilities, Family Members Take Our Concerns To Congress
By: Mary O'Riordan, President, Parent Hospital Association, Sonoma Developmental Center.I attended the VOR Annual Conference and Initiative in Washington, D.C. from June 9, through 16, 2011. VOR is our national family/guardian organization advocating for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. I was joined by other family members and advocates from southern California as well as representatives from the employee unions (CAPT AND AFSCME) mostly to bring the needs of developmentally disabled people to the attention of our elected representatives in D.C.
California representatives were briefed on important issues affecting people who are medically fragile and are fully dependent on 24-7 care for their survival. We visited all members of Congress, as well as our two state Senators and other key federal agencies within the Administration.
The purpose of our visit to our elected representatives was, most importantly, to try to get them signed on as co-sponsors of H.R. 2032, if possible, or at least get them to support this Bill. This legislation, if passed, would require that residents of Intermediate Care Facilities, such as Sonoma Developmental Center, and their families and/or legal guardians be notified in advance of a class action lawsuit involving the closure of the facility where they live. They would be given a time limited opportunity to opt out before the lawsuit is filed. Lawsuits by federally funded attorneys have resulted in residential closures and the eviction of thousands of developmentally disabled individuals, without regard to their choice of staying in their homes where they have lived and thrived for many years. This very often has tragic outcomes – preventable deaths, homelessness, abuse, neglect, prisons.
This important legislation was introduced by Democratic Congressman Barney Frank of Massachusetts; Republican Representative Bob Goodlatte; of Virginia; Democratic Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida.
Americans with severe and profound intellectual disabilities are being seriously threatened by these class action lawsuit and the closure of their homes. Reduction in budgets, and a shift of basic government philosophy that dictates all people are allegedly better served living in a community setting, such as board and care homes, or group homes. This often means that needed medical, and dental care, and other specialized care is reduced or non-existent once they leave these facilities which has all the centralized services to provide specialized care for this unique population.
Many of the important programs that serve this vulnerable population come from the Federal level, such as Social Security and Medicaid. Many laws have been passed on the Federal level that affect where this vulnerable population may live. Many of these laws are being misused by those with an agenda to close all congregate type care, where all the necessary services are centralized and are excellent, an example of this is the Sonoma Developmental Center and the other developmental centers in the state.
It is important to note that nothing in the Olmstead Decision, Olmstead v. L.C.119 St. Ct 2176 – speaks of the elimination of all congregate type facilities. The following is a quote from Justice Ginsberg:
”We emphasize that nothing in the ADA “Americans with Disabilities Act “or its implementing regulations condones termination of institutional settings for persons unable to handle or benefit from community settings...Nor is there any federal requirement that community-based treatment be imposed on patients who do not desire it.” 119.S. Ct.2176,2187 (1999)
That's what the law states, yet the Regional Center case workers, Disability Rights Advocates, and numerous others who make decisions that are ideologically based constantly reference the Olmstead Decision as the law that gives them the right to close all Intermediate Care Facilities (ICF's) in the state. This leaves frail, disabled people without the necessary medical, dental, professional staff and oversight for medications that they need for their very survival.We all remember the Reagan years in Sacramento when all the facilities for mentally ill people were closed and we see every day the horrible outcome – people on the streets and in the prisons instead of being in treatment centers. The same tragedy has been now happening to developmentally disabled people.
I know we will have those with opposing views on this come forward with examples of all the wonderful homes in the community and how well every disabled person is doing. They will show you their few wonderful homes but what you need to see is the hundreds of inadequate, unsuitable and inappropriate homes. Also, listen to the families – not the highly paid advocates, the money-making vendors, the lobbyists, and the case workers who accommodate them.
Your help is needed. Letters from all our friends and supporters would be greatly appreciated and should be sent to Senators Feinstein and Boxer, Representatives Nancy Pelosi, Lynn Woolsey, George Miller, Barbara Lee, Mike Thompson, Jackie Speier. Gerald McNerney, Wally Herger, Dan Lungren, Doris Matsui, Barbara Lee, Laura Richardson, Pete Stark, Zoe Lofgren, Anna Eshoo, Mike Honda, John Garamendi, asking them to co-sponsor H.R. 2032.
Suggestions for your letter – remind them that VOR members throughout the country visited Congressional offices last week. In case your office was not able to schedule an appointment for a VOR member to visit, our VOR members were seeking support for H.R. 2032, and seeking cosponsors and seeking a Senate companion bill. This legislation is very important for the continuation of specialized services for developmentally disabled people Please give this request your fully attention and support.
Important: We were told by several of the offices we visited that Disability Rights people called their offices that morning asking them to oppose this legislation. As we pointed out to the staff people we met with, Disability Rights is the state version of Protection and Advocacy and they are the ones who usually file these mean spirited lawsuits.
-----